Hold Animal Use Committees Accountable for Their Failures
Many biomedical research laboratories use animal testing to conduct their experiments. With
these experiments comes the issue of trust and accountability. This article critiques the
functioning of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) in research institutions.
The author, Lisa Jones-Engel, is a PETA advisor, a primate scientist, and a former member of the
University of Washington’s IACUC. She focuses on the effectiveness of IACUCs, and whether
or not they are being transparent when it comes to upholding animal welfare and ethical research
practices.
The author being a former UW IACUC member allows for insight on what exactly happens
within the committees. She states how during her experience the IACUC was violating the
public’s trust. One major concern raised was that IACUCs have evolved into something that they
were not originally designed for. They are now primarily focused on technical and administrative
matters, rather than serving as oversight bodies that ensure the ethical treatment and well-being
of animals in research, education, and safety testing.
While I believe it is important to acknowledge these concerns and hold the IACUCs accountable
for any form of injustices in their practice, it is also important to consider the potential bias in the
article. The author is PETA advisor, an organization known for its strong stance on animal rights.
When it comes to something as serious as fighting for animal rights, it is important to seek a
balanced view of the topic. The article states the need for increased transparency and
accountability in IACUCs, which is essential for ethical animal research practices; However, the
question still lies… What practical solutions can be implemented to address these issues, while
still enabling scientific breakthroughs?
Posted by Nicole Matthews (5)
Jones-Engel, Lisa. “Opinion: Hold Animal Use Committees Accountable for Their Failures.”
The Scientist Magazine®, 27 July 2022,
www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/opinion-hold-animal-use-committees-accountable-
or-their-failures-70278.
Hi Nicole! This was a really interesting read. Animal testing has been a topic of interest here at UMass especially in the past couple of weeks. It is so shocking to see the extent of the animal testing and how even with the regulations we have for it today still allows for this level of cruelty. I agree with the article that safety regulations need to be more strict. Great read, good job!
ReplyDelete-Lyssa Cunha
DeleteHi Lyssa! Thank you! I agree with you that safety regulations should be stricter, but I do think that we should look at more topics and really dive in to see what alternatives are. I'm not sure if this is really as bad as they make it seem. This article being from PETA might not be super accurate. - Nicole M
Delete
ReplyDeleteHi Nicole, the concluding question you ask in your post is interesting to me because I am not sure there is one answer that could be applied as a general rule. As a result this is why I believe that having a committee that the public is able to put their faith in is important. Their ability to take cases and give each one the attention they need to give the best outcome is a strength of the committee's existence. However, if they have lost focus in achieving what they had set out to do, someone needs to either refocus them, or they need to be replaced.