The Science behind Dissociative Identify Disorder

The famously complex psychological condition, Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), is

characterized by alternating between two or more identities. This mental health condition is

categorized as a severe form of dissociation in which the person experiences a loss of

connection in their thoughts, memories, actions, and feelings of identity. It also comes with a

form of amnesia where the person is unable to remember things from when they were in their

dissociative state. It is unknown how many people suffer from this disease, but a small study

revealed that around 1.5% - 7% are affected yearly. This disease has been misunderstood as

the developing world often views it as a spiritual phenomenon. Still, it is authentic and an

established pathophysiological disorder according to the scientific community.

Everyone dissociates on occasion, whether it be daydreaming or zoning out when driving. The

dissociation with DID is constant and causes distress, as well as possibly impeding one or more

major life areas. There are two etiological approaches that have dominated the debate on DID

in the past 30 or so years. The first and most common is the posttraumatic model (PTM). With

PTM, most cases are experiencing an extreme stress response due to a major childhood

trauma. As the mind tries to find a way to cope with this trauma, it creates “compartments” in the

brain that try to help it heal in different ways. In simple terms, facing and accepting what

happened to a person is so painful, that their brain comes up with a way to protect them from

that trauma. The second is the sociocognitive model (SCM), which accepts that some people

act like they have multiple personalities without conscious intention. SCM is the product of a

cultural role, not trauma. What this means is through socialization and consuming popular

culture, one can develop DID. This is not talked about as much, as it is a lot less common, and

most treatments are focused on PTM. Studies on the brain have also been done that support

this dissociative disorder. These studies show alterations in the limbic system - the

hippocampus (which is in charge of long-term memory) and the amygdala (which controls

emotions) were remarkably smaller. Regional cerebral blood flow was also reduced in the

bilateral orbitofrontal cortex regions (as seen with attention deficit disorder).

Dissociative Identity Disorder is still the most controversial of the dissociative disorders and is

heavily debated among mental health professionals. It is also wildly disputed in regard to its

validity and use in the criminal justice system! Sensationalized media portrayals and a lack of

understanding have fueled many myths and misconceptions about the condition. Some

common myths include that DID is not real, that people fake the condition, that at least one

alternate personality is violent, that the condition cannot be easily diagnosed or treated, and that

someone with this disorder is very highly unstable. The stigma these myths generate makes it

challenging for people to reach out or ask for help. DID is very real, and although there is

definitely more research to be done, people should educate themselves before taking

misconceptions for a fact.

“Donna Ross” (3)

Comments

  1. This was super interesting to read, I didn't know much about DID before reading. I always find it really interesting to see how mental disorders are treated in terms of crimes. It seems like the lack of knowledge and misconceptions in the public may have an influence in criminal cases. Also don't forget to include the source!
    - Payton Carroll

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Donna! DID is one of the most heavily stigmatized mental disorders out there. I find it fascinating that psychology still has such a long way to go in terms of diagnostics. The brain itself isn't even fully understood yet. I wonder how the diagnostic tools for DID will change overtime once more is known about its causes. It's possible that once more is understood about DID, it will even become less rare! I'm looking forward to hearing more about this topic in the future as psychological advancements persist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jill! I agree, it is very interesting to find that science still has a ways to go with research for this disorder. I know right now some examples of diagnostic tools used include the Steinberg Depersonalization Test, the Dissociative Experiences Scale, and Test of Memory Malingering. Very cool names for tests! Anyways, there are a ton more but again, there is no single test that can determine if a person has DID.

      Delete
  3. This is very interesting and I learned a lot. I honestly have heard a lot about DID through its stigma and myths surrounding it--but it is very interesting to find out that there are two models of it. Even with that, that one is developed because of trauma and the other is social and culture based. I find it very interesting that this disorder is developed and not something someone is born with. I wonder if genetically some people are more prone to developing this disorder than others--and is it something that is heritable?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Madeline! I also found the two models aspect very interesting. DID is not an inheritable disorder, however it is said that genetics can contribute. What I mean by that is that it could be linked with common genetic triggers in siblings (or be genetically predisposition to disassociate). But I do believe because this is something that is developed, there is no more prone or less prone.

      Delete
  4. This is a very interesting post. DID is a well-known but poorly acknowledged mental disorder portrayed negatively in the media. I find it interesting that DID, unlike many other mental disorders, is not something you are born with but developed throughout life because of trauma; I wonder how the recurrence of said trauma can impact the likelihood of developing the disorder. With that said, I find it fascinating that we know so little about these disorders, and hopefully, with further research, it will become less and less common.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm happy to see that more research and normalization are being done for DID, especially cause when you take those percentages, at the higher end 490 million people are affected by DID. It's genuinely upsetting to see so many people say that it isn't real and that individuals are just making it up for attention when the reasoning for the development can be so traumatic. Hopefully, more research continues and there is something more that can be done for these individuals.
      Alexis Carson

      Delete
    2. Hi Alexis! I agree completely. The fact that some health care professionals claim to this day that this is not an actual condition is appalling. As of right now the treatment that best works is having the individual focus on their safety and stability, as well as processing the traumatic event that occurred. Then they may hopefully go through life without dissociating.

      Delete
  5. Hi Donna,
    While none of my classes focus too heavily on psychology, anything I learn about it I always find interesting. Based what you have presented in this articles, I do think this disorder is understood due to its common portrayal in movies and TV. As for treatment, one of the other artcles this week was about deep brain stimulation (DBS) and treating depression and parkinsons. I wonder if DBS could be used to treat DID as well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh wow, this was informative. This really needs some mainstream attention as the stigma is real.
      -Aaliyah T.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Strain-Induced Jamming in a Spirostomum Ambiguum Cell

Did Corona Virus Feel Much Longer than it Actually Was? It May Have Also Changed Your Personality

Slimy Skincare: The Effects of Snail Mucin on Skin