Hospital superbugs: Could one vaccine rule them all?


One vaccine that would cure any and all hospital bugs sounds too good to be true. Hospital

superbugs are strains of bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi commonly contracted during

one’s visit to the hospital. These superbugs pose a big problem in hospitals as the infections

they cause are hard to treat or impossible and they spread from patient to patient. They threaten

modern medicine as they are resistant to the antibiotics used during treatments and surgeries,

as well as increasing hospital bills and patient stays. One in every thirty-one patients battles a

bug they received in the hospital while there for a different health issue.


This article is an example of bad science, although it does hold some truth. For one, the study

conducted was done on mice. We are still a ways away from human trials. In this study, a single

dose of the vaccine was administered in mice, and this dose provided protection against nine

superbugs. This vaccine acts like an early warning system, where it alerts the immune system

to keep an eye out for anything “suspicious”. Although this vaccine stays on high alert for nine

superbugs, the World Health Organization has identified twelve superbugs that are labeled as

“priority”. So this “vaccine” does not cover “them all”, especially as the researchers noted that

they did only test for the nine, and they need to undergo more studies to find if it is able to

prevent other healthcare-associated infections. The title is misleading, as it leads the audience

to believe that one singular vaccine can cure any superbug. Brian Luna, an assistant professor

of molecular microbiology and immunology at USC states “Even if there were such vaccines,

multiple vaccines would have to be deployed simultaneously to protect against the full slate of

antibiotic-resistant microbes that cause healthcare-acquired infections”. So the conception of

“one” vaccine” ruling them all is also not competeley accurate. This vaccine also wouldn’t be

something that every person admitted would be able to get as it triggers the immune system

and with some conditions this would not be recommended as it could worsen their state. There

are still no FDA-approved vaccines that prevent the worst of the antiobiotic-resistant superbugs,

and the deeper you look into this issue, the more you realize that there is no concrete evidence

to support the title fully.


Superbugs are something the world of medicine is concerned about, as they grow and spread

rapidly, and are drug-resistant. Superbugs developing so quickly can be traced back to the

overuse of antibiotics, and the development of a vaccine that prevents infections from

happening in the first place will be very beneficial in the field of medicine. Bacteria will always

find ways to outsmart medicine (antiobiotics), so by decreasing infections aquired in the

hospitals, we would also be decreasing antiobiotics needed, which ultimately is also decreasing

antibiotic resistance. Researchers are making groundbreaking discoveries, and although there

are yet to be human trials, steps are being taken in the right direction.


“Donna Ross” (6)


​​“Hospital Superbugs: Could One Vaccine Rule Them All?” ScienceDaily, ScienceDaily, 4 Oct.

2023, www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/10/231004150336.htm.

Comments

  1. Hi Donna. It is unfortunate that your article is clickbait. It would be pretty cool if one vaccine could give us resistance to all superbugs. It is also unfortunate that microbes evolve to resist vaccines. It would be awesome if vaccines never stopped working due to evolving microbes. Then we would not have to get different influenza or COVID vaccines. - Calvin Keating

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that it is unfortunate that microbes evolve to resist vaccines. At least with this vaccine it works as an alert system so it is not that case. It is nice to think that one singular vaccine would battle any microbes.

      Delete
  2. Hi Donna!!! It is really fascinating to me how elusive some illnesses are even in today's super advanced medical landscape. Unfortunately, as was already commented on previously, this article it totally clickbait but it makes you wonder what the world would be like if there really was a way to get immunity from any superbug. I wonder what would happen to the Earth's population, economy, and overall wellbeing would happen if the general public were protected from a slew of different diseases. The disease that has always fascinated me most are prion diseases. They're still so elusive and deadly. No one really knows anything about them. I wonder how one could safely do research on these diseases.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Donna! Although this vaccine doesn't cover all superbugs, the fact that it was able to act as an alert system for 9 of them is super impressive. I hope that one day we will reach a point in science where one vaccine can really cover them all and maybe it could even go onto help with antibiotic resistance.
    Alexis Carson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! It is very impressive that this vaccine covers 9 superbugs. It seems like their research is continuing so I also hope that we find a vaccine that covers all of them as well.

      Delete
  4. Hi Donna!
    I really like how you critiqued the article in how it points out some limitations and misconceptions. The vaccine in question only provides protection against nine superbugs out of the twelve identified by the World Health Organization as "priority." This means that it doesn't cover all superbugs, as the title of the article suggests. The article does not take into account the effects of a vaccine that can cover all the superbugs and how some patients would be unable to take it. Despite these limitations, the development of a vaccine to prevent infections and decrease the need for antibiotics is crucial. Althoguh these vaccines are a step in the right direction, there is always the likely possibility that superbugs can evolve against these vaccines and more antibiotics.
    -Carla B

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, this article does state that it battles all "superbugs" when in reality it only battles nine of the twelve identified. I did really like that it went into the details of how some patients wouldn't even be able to take it due to their condition.

      Delete
    2. Hello Donna, I hope all is well! I really enjoyed reading your blog post on the prominent issues that these "superbugs" impose on clinical settings. As someone who works in clinical environments outside of university I believe is extremely important to be cautious of the spread of transmissible diseases and superbugs. If you have any more information on the status of testing or any new information I would love to hear about it.

      Delete
  5. Hi Donna! It is quite annoying seeing a title that is considered clickbait and doesn't tell the full story. I do think the issue of not testing all of the mice, only testing 9 of the 12 "prominent' labeled by the World Health Organization, is a problem. Furthermore, with only trials done on mice and no human trials, the title will be misleading people, which is a clear issue that needs to be addressed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Strain-Induced Jamming in a Spirostomum Ambiguum Cell

Did Corona Virus Feel Much Longer than it Actually Was? It May Have Also Changed Your Personality

Slimy Skincare: The Effects of Snail Mucin on Skin